.. | ||
api | ||
memstore | ||
types | ||
README.md |
Internal Documentation
Things I would like to improve...
While developing ClusterCockpit, there are a lot of things I learned and that I would change if redoing everything. Unfortunately, I did not have as much time as I hopped and a few things ended up a bit chaotic. This is partly because the requirements and features and metrics (and particularly their scopes) changed, PHP Symfony ate up a lot of dev. time, and it was my first big frontend. The frontend ended up particularly chaotic, but it works and I really like Svelte.
The cc-metric-store
, in my opinion, however, is one of the more interesting aspects of the ClusterCockpit stack, with very very interesting and effective possibilities for improvement! It was created just in a span of two months and is successfully deployed for multiple clusters. Yes, trying to implement your own time-series data-base might be crazy and naive, but where would you do something like that if not in university? I personally would not even call the metric store a TSDB for now because it lacks a lot of features. However, in our defense: there are not that many open source in-memory TSDBs. The closest thing I found was a redis extension, but it was lacking horizontal aggregation and other features. The core philosophy should not change and basically is KISS (keep it simple stupid):
- Because of the job-archive, only the last 48h or so need to be stored in a TSDB. This means that even for large clusters with lots of cores, storing everything in main-memory is very much feasible.
- In case of a power outage etc, missing monitoring data is the least of the admins problems: Redundancy and Consistency is not important.
- The metrics are always written and queried along a simple hierarchy:
cluster -> host -> ...
. This means that only a single tree-like index is needed (aggregations along this hierarchy are common and need to be fast!). - All measurements are done in fixed intervals. There is no need to know exactly when something was measured, only within what minute/"slot" a measurement was taken (a slot can cover 10s or so).
Here is a loose list of things I would do better if I could do it again. Please feel free to contact lou.knauer@fau.de before attempting to extend and improve this implementation. Because it is not much code and there still are lots of opportunities for improvement, in my opinion, it would make a good thesis of master project. If it is done well and the interface becomes truly generic and application independent, it could even become useful for others as well because, as I mentioned before, open-source in-memory TSDBs are not that common.
- Checkpoints/Archiving:
- Time-series data can be compressed using very delta-encoding or XORs with trailing/leading zeros: The gorilla paper has some examples.
- A few large files are better than a lot of small ones (ongoing work).
- Use a binary file format instead of JSON for faster en-/decoding (ongoing work).
- Make archiving more flexible, allow to move archives into another DB (for long-term storage).
- API:
- Writing:
- Currently, the line-protocol decoder is very strongly coupled to the format used by ClusterCockpit. Make it more flexible and generic. A single strict hierarchy is still a must!.
- Blank TCP/TLS write endpoints: Keep-alive connections without the protocol-overhead of HTTP(S). JWT (and optionally default tags) must only be transfered once.
- Reading:
- Re-do the query API completely! Allow for much more komplex queries with proper query language, such as for example:
select(from: 2022-01-08T00:00:00, to: 2022-01-09T23:59:59) > filter(hostname: ["e0001", "e0002", ...]) > topology-aggregation("sum", ["core0", "core1", "core2", "core3"]) > transform(flops_any: flops_dp * 2 + flops_sp) > metrics(flops_any)
- Re-do the query API completely! Allow for much more komplex queries with proper query language, such as for example:
- Writing:
- Internals:
- Not urgent because Go actually does quite a good job: rewrite in C/C++ or Rust (or another language without garbage collection)
- Alternatively: Implement a custom allocator for the chunks that bypasses GC and uses
mmap
. - Combine chunk-head (start-time, frequency, is-checkpointed, ...) and payload slice in the same allocation?
- Calculate stats once after a chunk is closed.
- Implement all the things needed for efficient and more complex queries.
- ...